Received: from nic.funet.fi (nic.funet.fi [128.214.248.6])
by odie.barnet.ac.uk (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id MAA25469
for <willy@odie.fluff.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 1997 12:02:32 +0100
Received: from vger.rutgers.edu ([128.6.190.2] EHLO vger.rutgers.edu ident: root [port 50963]) by nic.funet.fi with ESMTP id <12914-17628>; Thu, 16 Oct 1997 14:01:23 +0300
Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id <971231-406>; Thu, 16 Oct 1997 06:58:48 -0400
Received: from Axil.wave.co.nz ([202.49.46.2] EHLO axil.wave.co.nz ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 55555]) by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id <971361-406>; Thu, 16 Oct 1997 06:58:32 -0400
Received: from betty.wave.co.nz (wh16-13.wave.co.nz [202.49.46.76])
by axil.wave.co.nz (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id XAA13156
for <linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu>; Thu, 16 Oct 1997 23:58:06 +1300 (NZDT)
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 00:00:03 +1300
From: Peter Naulls <pnaulls@wave.co.nz>
To: linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
Subject: Re: Bugger Intel I want an ARM machine
Message-ID: <2c9cecd947%pnaulls@wave.co.nz>
In-Reply-To: <3445EFC9.F55F9359@kom.auc.dk>
Organization: Chocky Man Inc.
X-Mailer: Messenger v1.02 for RISC OS
X-Posting-Agent: RISC OS Newsbase 0.59f
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
Sender: owner-linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
>
> > NT is probably unlikely - because it talks directly to a lot of
> > hardware, but Win95, ARMLinux and RiscBSD are all very likely (after possible
> > modifications) since they run on the current hardware :)
>
> Actually NT is likely to happen for the PC-card. I talked to Aleph One
> recently and they are working on new 32-bit drivers for different
> "things", and they said that we may be able to run NT with those
